EPYC 9825 vs Atom C3558

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2125not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.47no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency9.05no data
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Turin (2024)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$13,006

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)144
Threads4288
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Multiplier22no data
L1 cache224 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310SP5
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR5
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes12128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2017 10 October 2024
Physical cores 4 144
Threads 4 288
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 390 Watt

Atom C3558 has 2337.5% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, 3500% more physical cores and 7100% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3558 and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558
AMD EPYC 9825
EPYC 9825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3558 or EPYC 9825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.