Atom C3758 vs C3558

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3558
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 16 Watt
1.53
Atom C3758
2017
8 cores / 8 threads, 25 Watt
2.90
+89.5%

Atom C3758 outperforms Atom C3558 by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3558 and Atom C3758 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking21391665
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.471.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Power efficiency9.0410.97
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Goldmont (2016−2017)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)15 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$86$193

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Atom C3758 has 228% better value for money than Atom C3558.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3558 and Atom C3758 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads48
Base clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz2.2 GHz
Multiplier2222
L1 cache224 KB448 KB
L2 cache8 MB16 MB
L3 cache8 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature83 °C82 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3558 and Atom C3758 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA1310FCBGA1310
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3558 and Atom C3758. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssist++
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology--

Security technologies

Atom C3558 and Atom C3758 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB++
Secure Boot++
Secure Key++
SGX--
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3558 and Atom C3758 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3558 and Atom C3758. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4: 2400
Maximum memory size256 GB256 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s34.134 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3558 and Atom C3758.

PCIe version33
PCI Express lanes1216
USB revision33
Total number of SATA ports1216
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports1216
Number of USB ports88
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBE4x10/2.5/1 GBE

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3558 1.53
Atom C3758 2.90
+89.5%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3558 2431
Atom C3758 4614
+89.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.53 2.90
Physical cores 4 8
Threads 4 8
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3558 has 56.3% lower power consumption.

Atom C3758, on the other hand, has a 89.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Atom C3758 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3558 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3558 and Atom C3758, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3558
Atom C3558
Intel Atom C3758
Atom C3758

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate Atom C3558 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 4 votes

Rate Atom C3758 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3558 or Atom C3758, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.