Opteron 3320 EE vs Atom C3538

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.19
Opteron 3320 EE
2012
4 cores / 4 threads, 25 Watt
1.21
+1.7%

Opteron 3320 EE outperforms Atom C3538 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking23472329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency7.514.58
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Delhi (2012−2013)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)4 December 2012 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed2.1 GHz1.9 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2.5 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache224 KB192 KB
L2 cache8 MB4096 KB
L3 cache8 MB8192 KB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR3
Maximum memory size256 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE.

PCIe version32.0
PCI Express lanes12no data
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.19
Opteron 3320 EE 1.21
+1.7%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3538 1889
Opteron 3320 EE 1918
+1.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 1.21
Recency 15 August 2017 4 December 2012
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Atom C3538 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

Opteron 3320 EE, on the other hand, has a 1.7% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and Opteron 3320 EE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
AMD Opteron  3320 EE
Opteron 3320 EE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Opteron 3320 EE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or Opteron 3320 EE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.