EPYC 7713 vs Atom C3538

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3538
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
1.19
EPYC 7713
2021
64 cores / 128 threads, 225 Watt
52.14
+4282%

EPYC 7713 outperforms Atom C3538 by a whopping 4282% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking234529
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.043.87
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel AtomAMD EPYC
Power efficiency7.5121.93
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Milan (2021−2023)
Release date15 August 2017 (7 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$75$7,060

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7713 has 9575% better value for money than Atom C3538.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads4128
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.68 GHz
Multiplier2120
L1 cache224 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache8 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache8 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature87 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCBGA1310SP3
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist+no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data

Security technologies

Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 2133DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size256 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth29.871 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713.

PCIe version34.0
PCI Express lanes12128
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports12no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports12no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN2x10/2.5/1 GBE + 2x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3538 1.19
EPYC 7713 52.14
+4282%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3538 1889
EPYC 7713 82825
+4285%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Atom C3538 255
EPYC 7713 1579
+519%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Atom C3538 895
EPYC 7713 15297
+1609%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.19 52.14
Recency 15 August 2017 15 March 2021
Physical cores 4 64
Threads 4 128
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

Atom C3538 has 1400% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7713, on the other hand, has a 4281.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 7713 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3538 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3538 and EPYC 7713, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3538
Atom C3538
AMD EPYC 7713
EPYC 7713

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate Atom C3538 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 115 votes

Rate EPYC 7713 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3538 or EPYC 7713, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.