EPYC 4564P vs Atom C3338

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom C3338
2017
2 cores / 2 threads, 8 Watt
0.65
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.07
+5911%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Atom C3338 by a whopping 5911% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking275172
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0653.48
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiency6.8321.75
Architecture codenameGoldmont (2016−2017)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date22 February 2017 (7 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 4564P has 89033% better value for money than Atom C3338.

Detailed specifications

Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads232
Base clock speed1.5 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed2.2 GHz5.7 GHz
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache112 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature89 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCBGA1310AM5
Power consumption (TDP)8.5 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
QuickAssist-no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

EDB+no data
Secure Boot+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4: 1866DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth14.936 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version35.0
PCI Express lanes1028
USB revision3no data
Total number of SATA ports10no data
Max number of SATA 6 Gb/s Ports10no data
Number of USB ports8no data
Integrated LAN4x2.5/1 GBEno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom C3338 0.65
EPYC 4564P 39.07
+5911%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom C3338 1028
EPYC 4564P 62061
+5937%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.65 39.07
Recency 22 February 2017 21 May 2024
Physical cores 2 16
Threads 2 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 170 Watt

Atom C3338 has 2025% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 5910.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom C3338 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom C3338 and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom C3338
Atom C3338
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Atom C3338 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom C3338 or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.