Ryzen 5 3600 vs Atom 330

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 330
2008
2 cores / 4 threads, 8 Watt
0.23
Ryzen 5 3600
2019
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
11.17
+4757%

Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Atom 330 by a whopping 4757% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3175693
Place by popularitynot in top-1009
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data22.04
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel AtomAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency2.7216.26
Architecture codenameDiamondville (2008−2009)Matisse (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$43$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache112 KB96K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache0 KB32 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size51.9276 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors94 Million4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketPBGA437AM4
Power consumption (TDP)8 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card--

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 330 0.23
Ryzen 5 3600 11.17
+4757%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 330 363
Ryzen 5 3600 17746
+4789%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.23 11.17
Recency 2 April 2008 7 July 2019
Physical cores 2 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 8 Watt 65 Watt

Atom 330 has 712.5% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 5 3600, on the other hand, has a 4756.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 5 3600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 330 in performance tests.

Be aware that Atom 330 is a notebook processor while Ryzen 5 3600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 330 and Ryzen 5 3600, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 330
Atom 330
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Ryzen 5 3600

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 17331 vote

Rate Ryzen 5 3600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 330 or Ryzen 5 3600, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.