Atom 330 vs D2550

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom D2550 and Atom 330 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomIntel Atom
Architecture codenameCedarview (2011−2012)Diamondville (2008−2009)
Release date1 November 2011 (13 years ago)2 April 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$43

Detailed specifications

Atom D2550 and Atom 330 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads44
Base clock speed1.86 GHz1.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.87 GHz0.1 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data533.33 MT/s
Multiplierno data12
L1 cache64 KB (per core)112 KB
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography32 nm45 nm
Die size66 mm251.9276 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C85 °C
Number of transistors176 million94 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data0.9V-1.1625V

Compatibility

Information on Atom D2550 and Atom 330 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCBGA559PBGA437
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt8 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom D2550 and Atom 330. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)--
Turbo Boost Technology--
Hyper-Threading Technology++
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAE36 Bitno data
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Atom D2550 and Atom 330 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom D2550 and Atom 330 are enumerated here.

VT-d--
VT-x--
VT-i-no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom D2550 and Atom 330. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data
Maximum memory size4 GB8 GB
Max memory channels1no data
Maximum memory bandwidth6.4 GB/sno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650-

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom D2550 and Atom 330 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported2-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom D2550 and Atom 330.

PCI Express lanes4no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom D2550 409
+12.7%
Atom 330 363

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 2011 2 April 2008
Chip lithography 32 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 8 Watt

Atom D2550 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 40.6% more advanced lithography process.

Atom 330, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Atom D2550 and Atom 330. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom D2550 and Atom 330, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom D2550
Atom D2550
Intel Atom 330
Atom 330

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 36 votes

Rate Atom D2550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 64 votes

Rate Atom 330 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom D2550 or Atom 330, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.