Celeron 927UE vs M 380

Primary details

Comparing Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking	3284	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Series	Celeron M	Intel Celeron
Power efficiency	0.77	no data
Architecture codename	Dothan (2004−2005)	Ivy Bridge (2012−2013)
Release date	no data	1 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$107

Detailed specifications

Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores	1 (Single-Core)	1 (Single-Core)
Threads	1	1
Base clock speed	1.6 GHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1.6 GHz	1.5 GHz
Bus rate	400 MHz	no data
L1 cache	no data	64 KB
L2 cache	no data	256 KB
L3 cache	1 MB L2 KB	1 MB
Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Maximum core temperature	100 °C	100 °C
64 bit support	-	+
Windows 11 compatibility	-	-
VID voltage range	1.004V-1.292V	no data

Compatibility

Information on Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Socket	PPGA478, H-PBGA479	BGA
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)	-	+
Turbo Boost Technology	-	no data
Hyper-Threading Technology	-	no data
Idle States	-	+
Thermal Monitoring	-	+
Demand Based Switching	-	no data
PAE	32 Bit	no data
FSB parity	-	no data

Security technologies

Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT	-	no data
EDB	+	no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE are enumerated here.

VT-x

-

no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card

no data

Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) (350 - 900 MHz)

Pros & cons summary

---

Chip lithography	90 nm	22 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	21 Watt	17 Watt

---

Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.

---