Celeron 927UE vs M 380
Primary details
Comparing Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Series | Celeron M | Intel Celeron |
Architecture codename | Dothan (2004−2005) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
Release date | no data | 1 January 2013 (11 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $107 |
Detailed specifications
Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
Threads | 1 | 1 |
Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
Bus support | 400 MHz | no data |
L1 cache | no data | 64 KB |
L2 cache | no data | 256 KB |
L3 cache | no data | 1 MB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
64 bit support | - | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Socket | no data | BGA |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
Idle States | no data | + |
Thermal Monitoring | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
ECC memory support | - | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics (Ivy Bridge) |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 22 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 17 Watt |
Celeron 927UE has a 309.1% more advanced lithography process, and 23.5% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Celeron M 380 and Celeron 927UE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.