E2-3000 vs Atom 230

VS

Aggregate performance score

Atom 230
2008
1 core / 2 threads, 4 Watt
0.11
E2-3000
2013
2 cores / 2 threads, 15 Watt
0.46
+318%

E2-3000 outperforms Atom 230 by a whopping 318% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and E2-3000 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking33622926
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel AtomAMD E-Series
Power efficiency2.602.90
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Kabini (2013−2014)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)23 May 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and E2-3000 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz1.65 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KBno data
L2 cache512 KB1024 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm28 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2246 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data90 °C
Number of transistors47 Million1,178 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and E2-3000 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FT3
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and E2-3000. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE386x SSE (1, 2, 3, 3S, 4.1, 4.2, 4A),-64, AES, AVX
AES-NI-+
FMA-FMA4
AVX-+
PowerNow-+
PowerGating-+
VirusProtect-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-no data
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and E2-3000 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and E2-3000 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d-no data
VT-x-no data
IOMMU 2.0-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and E2-3000. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3
Maximum memory size8 GBno data
Max memory channelsno data1

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-AMD Radeon HD 8280
Enduro-+
Switchable graphics-+
UVD-+
VCE-+

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Atom 230 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs.

DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Atom 230 and E2-3000 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX-DirectX® 12
Vulkan-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and E2-3000.

PCIe versionno data2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Atom 230 0.11
E2-3000 0.46
+318%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
E2-3000 726
+330%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.11 0.46
Recency 2 April 2008 23 May 2013
Physical cores 1 2
Chip lithography 45 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 15 Watt

Atom 230 has 275% lower power consumption.

E2-3000, on the other hand, has a 318.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 100% more physical cores, and a 60.7% more advanced lithography process.

The E2-3000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Atom 230 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and E2-3000, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
AMD E2-3000
E2-3000

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 26 votes

Rate E2-3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or E2-3000, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.