i7-12700F vs Atom 230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data36.33
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data28.15
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29$386

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads220
Base clock speed1.6 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/sno data
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB80K (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB25 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States-+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switching-no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+
FSB parity-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size8 GB128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F.

PCIe versionno data5.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
i7-12700F 30700
+18066%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 230 557
i7-12700F 9146
+1542%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 230 851
i7-12700F 56067
+6488%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 4 January 2022
Physical cores 1 12
Threads 2 20
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 65 Watt

Atom 230 has 1525% lower power consumption.

i7-12700F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, and 1100% more physical cores and 900% more threads.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Atom 230 is a notebook processor while Core i7-12700F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Core i7-12700F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Core i7-12700F
Core i7-12700F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1393 votes

Rate Core i7-12700F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Core i7-12700F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.