Ultra 9 288V vs Atom 230

VS

Primary details

Comparing Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated620
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesIntel Atomno data
Power efficiencyno data38.80
Architecture codenameSilverthorne (2008−2010)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date2 April 2008 (16 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29no data

Detailed specifications

Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speed1.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed0.1 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate533.33 MT/s37 MHz
Multiplier12no data
L1 cache56 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm3 nm
Die size25.9638 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature85 °C100 °C
Number of transistors47 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage range0.9V-1.1625Vno data

Compatibility

Information on Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketPBGA437Intel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)4 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE2, Intel® SSE3, Intel® SSSE3no data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)-+
Turbo Boost Technology-no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-+
Idle States-no data
Demand Based Switching-no data
FSB parity-no data

Security technologies

Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT-+
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V are enumerated here.

VT-d-+
VT-x-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size8 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card-Arc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Atom 230 169
Ultra 9 288V 19542
+11463%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Atom 230 557
Ultra 9 288V 10697
+1820%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Atom 230 851
Ultra 9 288V 45377
+5232%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2008 24 September 2024
Physical cores 1 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 45 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 4 Watt 30 Watt

Atom 230 has 650% lower power consumption.

Ultra 9 288V, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, 700% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Atom 230 and Core Ultra 9 288V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Atom 230
Atom 230
Intel Core Ultra 9 288V
Core Ultra 9 288V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 56 votes

Rate Atom 230 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 10 votes

Rate Core Ultra 9 288V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Atom 230 or Core Ultra 9 288V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.