Xeon 3.06 vs Athlon XP-M 2500+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Xeon 3.06 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Gallatin (2003−2004) |
| Release date | January 2001 (23 years ago) | March 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Xeon 3.06 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 1.86 GHz | 3.07 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 16K |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 2 MB |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 130 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | 237 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 63 million | 286 million |
| 64 bit support | - | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Xeon 3.06 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 |
| Socket | A | 604 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 97 Watt |
Pros & cons summary
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 97 Watt |
Athlon XP-M 2500+ has 115.6% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Xeon 3.06. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon XP-M 2500+ is a notebook processor while Xeon 3.06 is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2500+ and Xeon 3.06, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
