i5-1235U (IPU) vs Athlon XP-M 2000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon XP-M | no data |
| Architecture codename | Barton (2001−2004) | Alder Lake-U (2022) |
| Release date | 17 June 2003 (21 year ago) | 23 February 2022 (2 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $134 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.53 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Bus type | FSB | no data |
| Bus rate | 266 MT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 11.5 | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 80K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 1.25 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 101 mm2 | no data |
| Number of transistors | 54 Million | no data |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU) technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU) are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4, DDR5 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe 80EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU).
| PCIe version | no data | 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 20 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 17 June 2003 | 23 February 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 10 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 130 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 25 Watt | 15 Watt |
i5-1235U (IPU) has an age advantage of 18 years, 900% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, a 1200% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU). We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP-M 2000+ and Core i5-1235U (IPU), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
