i3-9100F vs Athlon XP 1600+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated1369
Place by popularitynot in top-10040
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data9.89
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataIntel Core i3
Power efficiencyno data6.17
Architecture codenameThoroughbred (2001−2002)Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Release dateJanuary 2001 (23 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$122

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads14
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed1.4 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplierno data36
L1 cache128 KB256 KB
L2 cache256 KB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB6 MB (shared)
Chip lithography180 nm14 nm
Die size150 mm2126 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
Number of transistors37 millionno data
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAFCLGA1151
Power consumption (TDP)63 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+

Security technologies

Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
MPX-+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon XP 1600+ 174
i3-9100F 6735
+3771%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 4
Chip lithography 180 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 63 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon XP 1600+ has 3.2% lower power consumption.

i3-9100F, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon XP 1600+ and Core i3-9100F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon XP 1600+
Athlon XP 1600+
Intel Core i3-9100F
Core i3-9100F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 16 votes

Rate Athlon XP 1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 6972 votes

Rate Core i3-9100F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon XP 1600+ or Core i3-9100F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.