5 210H vs Athlon X4 950
Aggregate performance score
Core 5 210H outperforms Athlon X4 950 by a whopping 387% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1848 | 728 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.66 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Power efficiency | 3.28 | 23.08 |
| Architecture codename | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | Raptor Lake-H (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 27 July 2017 (7 years ago) | 18 December 2024 (less than a year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $60 | $342 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 4.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 12 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Die size | 246 mm2 | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 74 °C | 72 °C |
| Number of transistors | 1,178 million | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM4 | Intel BGA 1744 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | + | - |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | - | + |
Security technologies
Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 Dual-channel | DDR4, DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Iris Xe Graphics 48EU |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H.
| PCIe version | no data | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 2.24 | 10.90 |
| Recency | 27 July 2017 | 18 December 2024 |
| Physical cores | 4 | 8 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 28 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
5 210H has a 386.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 44.4% lower power consumption.
The Core 5 210H is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 950 in performance tests.
Note that Athlon X4 950 is a desktop processor while Core 5 210H is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 950 and Core 5 210H, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
