EPYC 4584PX vs Athlon X4 830

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X4 830
2015
4 cores / 4 threads, 65 Watt
1.83
EPYC 4584PX
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 120 Watt
37.61
+1955%

EPYC 4584PX outperforms Athlon X4 830 by a whopping 1955% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking200981
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data54.13
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency2.6629.64
Architecture codenameKaveri (2014−2015)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release dateFebruary 2015 (9 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads432
Base clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz5.7 GHz
L1 cache256K64 KB (per core)
L2 cache4 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography28 nm5 nm
Die size245 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C47 °C
Number of transistors2,411 million17,840 million
64 bit support++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFM2+AM5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3-2133DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Graphics

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X4 830 1.83
EPYC 4584PX 37.61
+1955%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X4 830 2901
EPYC 4584PX 59735
+1959%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.83 37.61
Physical cores 4 16
Threads 4 32
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 120 Watt

Athlon X4 830 has 84.6% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4584PX, on the other hand, has a 1955.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4584PX is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X4 830 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon X4 830 is a desktop processor while EPYC 4584PX is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X4 830 and EPYC 4584PX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X4 830
Athlon X4 830
AMD EPYC 4584PX
EPYC 4584PX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4 20 votes

Rate Athlon X4 830 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 7 votes

Rate EPYC 4584PX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X4 830 or EPYC 4584PX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.