Athlon X2 L310 vs Athlon X2 QL-65

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon X2 QL-65
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.38
+81%
Athlon X2 L310
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 13 Watt
0.21

Athlon X2 QL-65 outperforms Athlon X2 L310 by an impressive 81% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30093213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon2x AMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.031.53
Architecture codenameLion (2008−2009)Conesus (2009)
Release date1 September 2009 (15 years ago)10 September 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz1.2 GHz
Bus rate3600 MHz800 MHz
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography65 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketS1g2BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt13 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensions65 nm, 1.075 - 1.125MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection
PowerNow+-
VirusProtect-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310 are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon X2 QL-65 0.38
+81%
Athlon X2 L310 0.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 QL-65 609
+85.1%
Athlon X2 L310 329

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1630
+65.1%
Athlon X2 L310 987

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon X2 QL-65 3213
+83.9%
Athlon X2 L310 1747

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon X2 QL-65 1489
+71.9%
Athlon X2 L310 866

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Athlon X2 QL-65 39
+168%
Athlon X2 L310 104.35

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 0.21
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 13 Watt

Athlon X2 QL-65 has a 81% higher aggregate performance score.

Athlon X2 L310, on the other hand, has 169.2% lower power consumption.

The Athlon X2 QL-65 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon X2 L310 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-65 and Athlon X2 L310, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 QL-65
Athlon X2 QL-65
AMD Athlon X2 L310
Athlon X2 L310

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.4 127 votes

Rate Athlon X2 QL-65 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.4 12 votes

Rate Athlon X2 L310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 QL-65 or Athlon X2 L310, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.