Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U vs Athlon X2 QL-62
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 986 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 45.20 |
| Architecture codename | Lion (2008−2009) | Barcelo-U PRO (Zen 3) (2022) |
| Release date | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) | 19 April 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2 GHz | 4.1 GHz |
| Bus rate | 3600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 512K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | S1g2 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualization | PRO, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| FMA | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| PowerNow | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 3 June 2008 | 19 April 2022 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 15 Watt |
Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U has an age advantage of 13 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 828.6% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 QL-62 and Ryzen 3 PRO 5475U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
