VIA Centaur CHA vs Athlon X2 L310
Primary details
Comparing Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 3260 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Server |
| Series | 2x AMD Athlon | no data |
| Power efficiency | 1.54 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Conesus (2009) | CHA |
| Release date | 10 September 2009 (15 years ago) | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 1.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.2 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | 800 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 16 nm |
| Die size | no data | 195 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | no data |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 2 |
| Socket | BGA / 638 lidless micro-PGA | VIA Socket 2084 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 70 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Virtualization, Enhanced Virus Protection | no data |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 44 |
Pros & cons summary
| Physical cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 16 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 13 Watt | 70 Watt |
Athlon X2 L310 has 438.5% lower power consumption.
VIA Centaur CHA, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 306.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Athlon X2 L310 is a notebook processor while VIA Centaur CHA is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 L310 and VIA Centaur CHA, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
