Apple M1 Pro 8-Core vs Athlon X2 BE-2400

Primary details

Comparing Athlon X2 BE-2400 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated709
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataApple M-Series
Architecture codenameBrisbane (2007−2008)no data
Release dateOctober 2007 (17 years ago)18 October 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon X2 BE-2400 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.3 GHz3.22 GHz
L1 cache256 KB2.3 MB
L2 cache512 KB28 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die size126 mm2no data
Number of transistors154 million33700 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon X2 BE-2400 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM2no data
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt2060 ‑ 3220 Watt

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataApple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon X2 BE-2400 674
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core 17195
+2451%

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 2060 Watt

Athlon X2 BE-2400 has 4477.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, on the other hand, has 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon X2 BE-2400 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon X2 BE-2400 is a desktop processor while Apple M1 Pro 8-Core is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon X2 BE-2400 and Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon X2 BE-2400
Athlon X2 BE-2400
Apple M1 Pro 8-Core
M1 Pro 8-Core

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4 votes

Rate Athlon X2 BE-2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 102 votes

Rate Apple M1 Pro 8-Core on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon X2 BE-2400 or Apple M1 Pro 8-Core, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.