Xeon E5450 vs Athlon PRO 300GE

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 300GE
2019
2 cores / 4 threads, 35 Watt
2.76
+66.3%

Athlon PRO 300GE outperforms Xeon E5450 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking16952081
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency7.321.93
Architecture codenameZen+ (2018−2019)no data
Release date30 September 2019 (5 years ago)1 October 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)no data
Threads4no data
Base clock speedno data3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzno data
Multiplier34no data
L1 cache192 KBno data
L2 cache1 MBno data
L3 cache4 MB12 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography12 nm45 nm
Die size209.78 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data67 °C
Number of transistors4950 Millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data0.85V-1.35V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketSocket AM4LGA771
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI+-
FMA+-
AVX+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
FSB parityno data+
Precision Boost 2+no data

Security technologies

Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666no data
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardAMD Radeon RX Vega 3no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 300GE 2.76
+66.3%
Xeon E5450 1.66

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 300GE 4308
+67%
Xeon E5450 2580

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon PRO 300GE 938
+142%
Xeon E5450 388

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon PRO 300GE 1912
+74.3%
Xeon E5450 1097

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.76 1.66
Recency 30 September 2019 1 October 2007
Chip lithography 12 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 80 Watt

Athlon PRO 300GE has a 66.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 128.6% lower power consumption.

The Athlon PRO 300GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5450 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 300GE is a desktop processor while Xeon E5450 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 300GE and Xeon E5450, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 300GE
Athlon PRO 300GE
Intel Xeon E5450
Xeon E5450

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 113 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 300GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1281 vote

Rate Xeon E5450 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 300GE or Xeon E5450, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.