Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS vs Athlon PRO 200GE

Aggregate performance score

Athlon PRO 200GE
2018
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
2.32
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024
8 cores / 16 threads, 28 Watt
16.93
+630%

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS outperforms Athlon PRO 200GE by a whopping 630% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1808387
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
SeriesAMD Athlonno data
Power efficiency6.2757.19
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)Hawk Point (2024)
Release date1 June 2018 (6 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache96K (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache4 MB (shared)16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size209.78 mm2178 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 million25,000 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketAM4FP7
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt28 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
Precision Boost 2++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4 Dual-channelDDR5
Maximum memory size64 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
AMD Radeon Vega 3AMD Radeon 780M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data20

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon PRO 200GE 2.32
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 16.93
+630%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon PRO 200GE 3693
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS 26897
+628%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 16.93
Integrated graphics card 2.98 18.32
Recency 1 June 2018 16 April 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 28 Watt

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS has a 629.7% higher aggregate performance score, 514.8% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 5 years, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon PRO 200GE in performance tests.

Note that Athlon PRO 200GE is a desktop processor while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon PRO 200GE and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon PRO 200GE
Athlon PRO 200GE
AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate Athlon PRO 200GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 12 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon PRO 200GE or Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.