Ultra 7 258V vs Athlon Neo X2 L335

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot rated621
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon Neono data
Power efficiencyno data68.40
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Lunar Lake (2024)
Release date1 October 2009 (15 years ago)24 September 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads28
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz4.8 GHz
Bus rate800 MHz37 MHz
L1 cache128 KB192 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB2.5 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data12 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm3 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1 BGAIntel BGA 2833
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt17 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHT 3.0, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
TSX-+

Security technologies

Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2DDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataArc 140V

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data4

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 529
Ultra 7 258V 19509
+3588%

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1331
Ultra 7 258V 9982
+650%

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 2565
Ultra 7 258V 36479
+1322%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon Neo X2 L335 1155
Ultra 7 258V 10693
+826%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2009 24 September 2024
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 8
Chip lithography 65 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 17 Watt

Ultra 7 258V has an age advantage of 14 years, 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 2066.7% more advanced lithography process, and 5.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L335 and Core Ultra 7 258V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L335
Athlon Neo X2 L335
Intel Core Ultra 7 258V
Core Ultra 7 258V

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 3 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L335 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 8 votes

Rate Core Ultra 7 258V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L335 or Core Ultra 7 258V, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.