Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 vs Athlon Neo X2 L325

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon Neo X2 L325
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 18 Watt
0.35
+119%
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
1 core / 1 thread, 30 Watt
0.16

Athlon Neo X2 L325 outperforms Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 by a whopping 119% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking30623295
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Series2x AMD Athlon NeoPentium 4-M
Power efficiency1.840.50
Architecture codenameCongo (2009)Northwood (2002−2004)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed1.5 GHz1.7 GHz
Bus rate1600 MHz400 MHz
L2 cache1 MBno data
Chip lithography65 nm130 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1no data
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt30 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsHyperTransport 3.0, MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization Technologyno data
VirusProtect+-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.35 0.16
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 65 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 30 Watt

Athlon Neo X2 L325 has a 118.8% higher aggregate performance score, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 66.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon Neo X2 L325 is our recommended choice as it beats the Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo X2 L325 and Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo X2 L325
Athlon Neo X2 L325
Intel Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7
Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 8 votes

Rate Athlon Neo X2 L325 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 12 votes

Rate Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo X2 L325 or Pentium 4-M P4-M 1,7, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.