Ryzen 9 7945HX3D vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance rankingnot rated82
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon NeoAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4)
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)27 July 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads132
Base clock speedno data2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus support1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography65 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature95 °C89 °C
Number of transistorsno data17,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketASB1FL1
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
AES-NIno data+
AVXno data+
VirusProtect+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D are enumerated here.

AMD-V++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5-5200

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data28

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

Athlon Neo MV-40 275
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 58036
+21004%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 21004% in Passmark.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Athlon Neo MV-40 1274
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 8478
+565%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 565% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Athlon Neo MV-40 1149
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 70414
+6031%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 6031% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Athlon Neo MV-40 102
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 5.9
+1629%

Athlon Neo MV-40 outperforms Ryzen 9 7945HX3D by 1629% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

Athlon Neo MV-40 0
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 62
+18658%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 18658% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Athlon Neo MV-40 0.1
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 23.4
+38900%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 38900% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 12%

Athlon Neo MV-40 332
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D 51122
+15298%

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D outperforms Athlon Neo MV-40 by 15298% in WinRAR 4.0.

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 27 July 2023
Physical cores 1 16
Threads 1 32
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 55 Watt

Athlon Neo MV-40 has 266.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, 1500% more physical cores and 3100% more threads, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
AMD Ryzen 9 7945HX3D
Ryzen 9 7945HX3D

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 105 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7945HX3D on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Ryzen 9 7945HX3D, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.