Ryzen 5 5625C vs Athlon Neo MV-40
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Athlon Neo | AMD Cezanne (Zen 3, Ryzen 5000) |
| Architecture codename | Huron (2009) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| Release date | 6 January 2009 (15 years ago) | 5 May 2022 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 2.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1600 MHz | no data |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 3 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 180 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 95 °C | 95 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 10,700 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | ASB1 | FP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualization | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | - | + |
| AVX | - | + |
| VirusProtect | + | - |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4-3200 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | AMD Radeon RX Vega 7 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | no data | 8 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 6 January 2009 | 5 May 2022 |
| Physical cores | 1 | 6 |
| Threads | 1 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 25 Watt |
Athlon Neo MV-40 has 66.7% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 5625C, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, 500% more physical cores and 1100% more threads, and a 828.6% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Ryzen 5 5625C, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
