Celeron M ULV 743 vs Athlon Neo MV-40

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3274not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon Neono data
Power efficiency1.07no data
Architecture codenameHuron (2009)no data
Release date6 January 2009 (15 years ago)1 July 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)no data
Threads1no data
Base clock speedno data1.3 GHz
Boost clock speed1.6 GHzno data
Bus rate1600 MHzno data
L1 cache128 KBno data
L2 cache512 KBno data
L3 cacheno data1 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography65 nm45 nm
Maximum core temperature95 °C100 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

SocketASB1BGA956
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, 3DNow!, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, AMD64, Enhanced Virus Protection, Virtualizationno data
VirusProtect+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data-
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-

Security technologies

Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 January 2009 1 July 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 45 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 10 Watt

Celeron M ULV 743 has an age advantage of 5 months, a 44.4% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Neo MV-40 and Celeron M ULV 743, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon Neo MV-40
Athlon Neo MV-40
Intel Celeron M ULV 743
Celeron M ULV 743

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 11 votes

Rate Athlon Neo MV-40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron M ULV 743 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon Neo MV-40 or Celeron M ULV 743, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.