Ryzen 3 8300G vs Athlon MP 2400+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon MP 2400+
2002
1 core / 1 thread, 60 Watt
0.27
Ryzen 3 8300G
2024
4 cores / 8 threads, 65 Watt
9.01
+3237%

Ryzen 3 8300G outperforms Athlon MP 2400+ by a whopping 3237% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3121845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data30.79
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon MPno data
Power efficiency0.4313.12
Architecture codenameK7 (2000−2004)Phoenix2 (2024)
Release date10 December 2002 (21 year ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$228$176

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores1 (Single-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads18
Base clock speedno data3.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2 GHz4.9 GHz
Bus typeFSBno data
Bus rate266 MT/sno data
Multiplier15no data
L1 cache128 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache256 KB1 MB (per core)
L3 cacheno data8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography130 nm4 nm
Die size85 mm2137 mm2
Number of transistors37 Million20,900 million
64 bit support-+
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
Socketno dataAM5
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5
Maximum memory size4 GBno data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 740M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G.

PCIe versionno data4.0
PCI Express lanesno data14

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon MP 2400+ 0.27
Ryzen 3 8300G 9.01
+3237%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon MP 2400+ 436
Ryzen 3 8300G 14316
+3183%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.27 9.01
Recency 10 December 2002 8 January 2024
Physical cores 1 4
Threads 1 8
Chip lithography 130 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 65 Watt

Athlon MP 2400+ has 8.3% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 3 8300G, on the other hand, has a 3237% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 21 year, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, and a 3150% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 3 8300G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon MP 2400+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon MP 2400+ is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 3 8300G is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon MP 2400+ and Ryzen 3 8300G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon MP 2400+
Athlon MP 2400+
AMD Ryzen 3 8300G
Ryzen 3 8300G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Athlon MP 2400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 10 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 8300G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon MP 2400+ or Ryzen 3 8300G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.