Xeon E5345 vs Athlon II X4 651

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 651
2011
4 cores / 4 threads, 100 Watt
2.32
+91.7%

Athlon II X4 651 outperforms Xeon E5345 by an impressive 92% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking17892321
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Architecture codenameLlano (2011−2012)Clovertown (2006−2007)
Release date14 November 2011 (12 years ago)14 November 2006 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$851

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads44
Base clock speed3 GHz2.33 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz0.33 GHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB (per die)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography32 nm65 nm
Die size228 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data66 °C
Number of transistors1,178 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data
VID voltage rangeno data1V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFM1LGA771,PLGA771
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
PAEno data32 Bit
FSB parityno data+
Statusno dataDiscontinued

Security technologies

Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345 are enumerated here.

AMD-V+-
VT-xno data+
EPTno data-

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 651 2.32
+91.7%
Xeon E5345 1.21

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 651 3584
+91.9%
Xeon E5345 1868

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 651 333
+4.4%
Xeon E5345 319

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 651 1108
+5.1%
Xeon E5345 1054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.32 1.21
Recency 14 November 2011 14 November 2006
Chip lithography 32 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 80 Watt

Athlon II X4 651 has a 91.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 103.1% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E5345, on the other hand, has 25% lower power consumption.

The Athlon II X4 651 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon E5345 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X4 651 is a desktop processor while Xeon E5345 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 651 and Xeon E5345, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 651
Athlon II X4 651
Intel Xeon E5345
Xeon E5345

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 184 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 651 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E5345 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 651 or Xeon E5345, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.