Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G vs Athlon II X4 640

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X4 640
2010
4 cores / 4 threads, 95 Watt
1.41
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
2020
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
10.18
+622%

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms Athlon II X4 640 by a whopping 622% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2214767
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.92no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 5
Power efficiency1.4014.81
Architecture codenamePropus (2009−2011)Renoir (2020−2023)
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)21 July 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$80no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads412
Base clock speed3 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3 GHz4.2 GHz
Multiplierno data37
L1 cache128 KB (per core)64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB8 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm7 nm
Die size169 mm2156 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data95 °C
Number of transistors300 million9,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4-3200
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon Vega 7

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G.

PCIe version2.03.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X4 640 1.41
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 10.18
+622%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X4 640 2245
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 16171
+620%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II X4 640 313
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 1565
+400%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II X4 640 949
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G 6119
+545%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.41 10.18
Recency 11 May 2010 21 July 2020
Physical cores 4 6
Threads 4 12
Chip lithography 45 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G has a 622% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, 50% more physical cores and 200% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 46.2% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X4 640 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X4 640 and Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X4 640
Athlon II X4 640
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1388 votes

Rate Athlon II X4 640 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1626 votes

Rate Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X4 640 or Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.