Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 vs Athlon II X3 455

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.52no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataTransmeta Crusoe
Power efficiency1.17no data
Architecture codenameRana (2009−2011)Crusoe (2001)
Release date7 December 2010 (14 years ago)1 June 2001 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$88no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores3 (Tri-Core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads31
Base clock speed3.3 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz1 GHz
Bus rateno data266 MHz
L1 cache128 KB (per core)128 KB
L2 cache512 KB (per core)512 KB
L3 cache0 KBno data
Chip lithography45 nm130 nm
Die size169 mm255 mm2
Number of transistors300 million36.8 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1no data
SocketAM3CBGA-474
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt7 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 December 2010 1 June 2001
Physical cores 3 1
Threads 3 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 7 Watt

Athlon II X3 455 has an age advantage of 9 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 188.9% more advanced lithography process.

Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, on the other hand, has 1257.1% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon II X3 455 is a desktop processor while Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 455 and Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X3 455
Athlon II X3 455
Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800
Crusoe TM-5800

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 171 vote

Rate Athlon II X3 455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.9 93 votes

Rate Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X3 455 or Transmeta Crusoe TM-5800, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.