Aubrey Isle vs Athlon II X3 425
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2461 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.94 | no data |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Server |
| Power efficiency | 0.99 | no data |
| Architecture codename | Rana (2009−2011) | Knights Ferry (2010) |
| Release date | 20 October 2009 (15 years ago) | 31 May 2010 (14 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $42 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 3 (Tri-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 3 | 128 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 1.2 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) | 32 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 256 KB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 45 nm | 45 nm |
| Die size | 169 mm2 | 684 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | 300 million | 2,300 million |
| 64 bit support | + | - |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | AM3 | PCIe x16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 300 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle.
| PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 20 October 2009 | 31 May 2010 |
| Physical cores | 3 | 32 |
| Threads | 3 | 128 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 95 Watt | 300 Watt |
Athlon II X3 425 has 215.8% lower power consumption.
Aubrey Isle, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 966.7% more physical cores and 4166.7% more threads.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon II X3 425 is a desktop processor while Aubrey Isle is a server/workstation one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X3 425 and Aubrey Isle, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
