Athlon 240GE vs Athlon II X2 265

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 265
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.83

Athlon 240GE outperforms Athlon II X2 265 by a whopping 257% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking25961659
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.643.42
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon
Power efficiency1.167.71
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Zen (2017−2020)
Release date21 September 2010 (14 years ago)6 September 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$83$75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Athlon 240GE has 109% better value for money than Athlon II X2 265.

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads24
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Multiplierno data35
L1 cache128 KB192 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm14 nm
Die size117 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors410 million4950 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3AM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
FMA-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2, DDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data42.671 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 265 0.83
Athlon 240GE 2.96
+257%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 265 1267
Athlon 240GE 4527
+257%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.83 2.96
Recency 21 September 2010 6 September 2018
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 240GE has a 256.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, 100% more threads, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 240GE is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 265 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 265 and Athlon 240GE, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 265
Athlon II X2 265
AMD Athlon 240GE
Athlon 240GE

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 39 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 60 votes

Rate Athlon 240GE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 265 or Athlon 240GE, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.