Pentium 4 HT 3.0E vs Athlon II X2 260

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2654not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.72no data
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency1.08no data
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Prescott (2001−2005)
Release date11 May 2010 (14 years ago)February 2004 (20 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$48no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads22
Base clock speed3.2 GHzno data
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz3 GHz
L1 cache128 KB16 KB
L2 cache1 MB1 MB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die size117 mm2109 mm2
Number of transistors410 million125 million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM3478
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt115 Watt

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR1, DDR2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E.

PCIe version2.0no data

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 115 Watt

Athlon II X2 260 has 100% more physical cores, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 76.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 260 and Pentium 4 HT 3.0E, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 260
Athlon II X2 260
Intel Pentium 4 HT 3.0E
Pentium 4 HT 3.0E

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 131 vote

Rate Athlon II X2 260 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 59 votes

Rate Pentium 4 HT 3.0E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 260 or Pentium 4 HT 3.0E, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.