Ryzen 3 3300U vs Athlon II X2 240

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II X2 240
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 65 Watt
0.68
Ryzen 3 3300U
2019
4 cores / 4 threads, 15 Watt
3.71
+446%

Ryzen 3 3300U outperforms Athlon II X2 240 by a whopping 446% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking27391507
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.28no data
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 3
Power efficiency0.9522.55
Architecture codenameRegor (2009−2013)Picasso (2019−2022)
Release date23 July 2009 (15 years ago)6 January 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$35no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataPCIe 3.0
Multiplierno data21
L1 cache256 KB384 KB
L2 cache2 MB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB4 MB (shared)
Chip lithography45 nm12 nm
Die size117 mm2209.78 mm2
Number of transistors410 million4940 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM3FP5
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt15 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI-+
AVX-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR3DDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data64 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data38.397 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U.

PCIe version2.03.0
PCI Express lanesno data12

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II X2 240 0.68
Ryzen 3 3300U 3.71
+446%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II X2 240 1042
Ryzen 3 3300U 5679
+445%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.68 3.71
Recency 23 July 2009 6 January 2019
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 45 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 15 Watt

Ryzen 3 3300U has a 445.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, a 275% more advanced lithography process, and 333.3% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 3 3300U is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II X2 240 in performance tests.

Note that Athlon II X2 240 is a desktop processor while Ryzen 3 3300U is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 240 and Ryzen 3 3300U, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II X2 240
Athlon II X2 240
AMD Ryzen 3 3300U
Ryzen 3 3300U

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 375 votes

Rate Athlon II X2 240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 216 votes

Rate Ryzen 3 3300U on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II X2 240 or Ryzen 3 3300U, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.