Athlon X2 4850e vs Athlon II X2 240
Primary details
Comparing Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2744 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 3.28 | no data |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
Power efficiency | 0.96 | no data |
Architecture codename | Regor (2009−2013) | Brisbane (2007−2008) |
Release date | 23 July 2009 (15 years ago) | March 2008 (16 years ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $35 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | no data |
Boost clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 512 KB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 117 mm2 | 126 mm2 |
Number of transistors | 410 million | 154 million |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM3 | AM2 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR3 | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e.
PCIe version | 2.0 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 45 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 65 Watt | 45 Watt |
Athlon II X2 240 has a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.
Athlon X2 4850e, on the other hand, has 44.4% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II X2 240 and Athlon X2 4850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.