Athlon 64 X2 6000+ vs Athlon II P320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II P320
2010
2 cores / 2 threads, 25 Watt
0.44
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
2007
2 cores / 2 threads, 125 Watt
0.59
+34.1%

Athlon 64 X2 6000+ outperforms Athlon II P320 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P320 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29602819
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Athlon IIno data
Power efficiency1.670.45
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Windsor (2006−2007)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)August 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P320 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz3.1 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHzno data
L1 cache256 KB256 KB
L2 cache1 MB512K
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data220 mm2
Number of transistorsno data227 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P320 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketS1g4AM2
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P320 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMno data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II P320 0.44
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 0.59
+34.1%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II P320 695
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 930
+33.8%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II P320 174
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 241
+38.5%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II P320 320
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ 419
+30.9%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 0.59
Chip lithography 45 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 125 Watt

Athlon II P320 has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 400% lower power consumption.

Athlon 64 X2 6000+, on the other hand, has a 34.1% higher aggregate performance score.

The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon II P320 in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon II P320 is a notebook processor while Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P320 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320
AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Athlon 64 X2 6000+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 77 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 314 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P320 or Athlon 64 X2 6000+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.