Core 2 Duo T7200 vs Athlon II M320

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon II M320
2009
2 cores / 2 threads, 35 Watt
0.47
Core 2 Duo T7200
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 34 Watt
0.47

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking29272932
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIIntel Core 2 Duo
Power efficiency1.271.31
Architecture codenameCaspian (2009)Merom (2006−2008)
Release date10 September 2009 (15 years ago)28 July 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$286

Detailed specifications

Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz2 GHz
Bus rate3200 MHz667 MHz
L1 cache128 KB64 KB
L2 cache1 MB4 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography45 nm65 nm
Die sizeno data143 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistorsno data291 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--
VID voltage rangeno data1.0375V-1.3V

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
SocketSocket S1 (S1g3)PPGA478, PBGA479
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt34 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsMMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, Enhanced 3DNow!, NX bit, AMD64, PowerNow!, AMD Virtualizationno data
PowerNow+-
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
FSB parityno data-

Security technologies

Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon II M320 0.47
Core 2 Duo T7200 0.47

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II M320 749
+0.7%
Core 2 Duo T7200 744

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon II M320 182
Core 2 Duo T7200 209
+14.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon II M320 325
Core 2 Duo T7200 329
+1.2%

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Athlon II M320 1668
Core 2 Duo T7200 1717
+3%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Recency 10 September 2009 28 July 2006
Chip lithography 45 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 34 Watt

Athlon II M320 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Core 2 Duo T7200, on the other hand, has 2.9% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II M320 and Core 2 Duo T7200, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II M320
Athlon II M320
Intel Core 2 Duo T7200
Core 2 Duo T7200

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 32 votes

Rate Athlon II M320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 109 votes

Rate Core 2 Duo T7200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II M320 or Core 2 Duo T7200, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.