Celeron U3405 vs Athlon II P320

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
SeriesAMD Athlon IIIntel Celeron
Architecture codenameChamplain (2010−2011)Westmere (2010−2011)
Release date12 May 2010 (14 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads22
Base clock speedno data1.06 GHz
Boost clock speed2.1 GHz0.07 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 1.0
Bus rate3200 MHz1 × 2.5 GT/s
Multiplierno data8
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache1 MB512 KB
L3 cacheno data2 MB
Chip lithography45 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data81 mm2
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
Number of transistorsno data382 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketS1g4BGA1288
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt18 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsSSE-3, SSE4A, 3DNow!, MMX, DEP, SVMno data
FMA-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Technologyno data-
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
PAEno data36 Bit
FDIno data+
Fast Memory Accessno data+

Security technologies

Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data-
EDBno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 are enumerated here.

VT-dno data-
VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR3-800, DDR3-1066
Maximum memory sizeno data8 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data17.051 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel® HD Graphics for Previous Generation Intel® Processors
Clear Videono data+
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.



Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon II P320 695
+1.6%
Celeron U3405 684

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 45 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 18 Watt

Celeron U3405 has a 40.6% more advanced lithography process, and 38.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon II P320 and Celeron U3405, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon II P320
Athlon II P320
Intel Celeron U3405
Celeron U3405

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 74 votes

Rate Athlon II P320 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate Celeron U3405 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon II P320 or Celeron U3405, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.