Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS vs Athlon Gold 7220C
Primary details
Comparing Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 505 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Series | AMD Mendocino (Zen 2, Ryzen 7020) | AMD Phoenix (Zen 4, Ryzen 7040) |
| Power efficiency | no data | 25.12 |
| Architecture codename | Mendocino (Zen 2) (2022−2023) | Phoenix (Zen4) (2023) |
| Release date | 23 May 2023 (1 year ago) | 5 January 2023 (2 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 6 (Hexa-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Base clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 4.3 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 3.7 GHz | 5 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 6 MB |
| L3 cache | 4 MB | 16 MB |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Die size | no data | 178 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 100 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card Compare | AMD Radeon 610M ( - 1900 MHz) | AMD Radeon 760M ( - 2600 MHz) |
Pros & cons summary
| Integrated graphics card | 2.88 | 14.85 |
| Recency | 23 May 2023 | 5 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 6 |
| Threads | 4 | 12 |
| Chip lithography | 6 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 54 Watt |
Athlon Gold 7220C has an age advantage of 4 months, and 260% lower power consumption.
Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, on the other hand, has 415.6% faster integrated GPU, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 50% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon Gold 7220C and Ryzen 5 PRO 7640HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
