Athlon 64 2850e vs Athlon 900
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Desktop processor |
| Architecture codename | Thunderbird (1999−2000) | Lima (2008−2009) |
| Release date | 6 March 2000 (24 years ago) | August 2008 (16 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $899 | no data |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 1 (Single-Core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 1 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 0.9 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128K |
| L2 cache | 512 KB | 512K |
| L3 cache | 0 KB | no data |
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Die size | 102 mm2 | 77 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | 65 °C |
| Number of transistors | 22 million | 122 million |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | A | AM2 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 22 Watt |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR1 | DDR2 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | N/A | no data |
Pros & cons summary
| Chip lithography | 180 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 22 Watt |
Athlon 64 2850e has a 176.9% more advanced lithography process, and 172.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e. We've got no test results to judge.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 900 and Athlon 64 2850e, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
