Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Aggregate performance score
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 outperforms Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ by a whopping 171% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 2824 | 3228 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
| Series | 2x Athlon 64 (Desktop) | Mobile Athlon 64 |
| Power efficiency | 0.49 | 0.32 |
| Architecture codename | Toledo (2006) | Newark (2003) |
| Release date | no data | August 2003 (21 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 1 (Single-Core) |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Boost clock speed | 2.6 GHz | 2 GHz |
| Bus rate | 1000 MHz | 800 MHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 128K |
| L2 cache | no data | 1 MB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | no data |
| Die size | no data | 193 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 106 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | no data | 1 |
| Socket | no data | 754 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 62 Watt |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.57 | 0.21 |
| Physical cores | 2 | 1 |
| Threads | 2 | 1 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 110 Watt | 62 Watt |
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 has a 171.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.
Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, on the other hand, has 77.4% lower power consumption.
The Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ in performance tests.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is a desktop processor while Mobile Athlon 64 3200+ is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Mobile Athlon 64 3200+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
