Atom x5-Z8350 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.57
+1.8%

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 outperforms Atom x5-Z8350 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28112823
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)5x Intel Atom
Power efficiency0.49no data
Architecture codenameToledo (2006)Cherry Trail (2015−2016)
Release dateno data (2024 years ago)8 February 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data1.44 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz1.92 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L2 cacheno data2 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperatureno data90 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1 (Uniprocessor)
Socketno dataUTFCBGA592
Power consumption (TDP)110 Wattno data

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

Secure Bootno data+
Identity Protection-+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 are enumerated here.

VT-xno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno data4 GB
Maximum memory sizeno data2 GB
Max memory channelsno data1
Maximum memory bandwidthno data12.8 GB/s

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics (Cherry Trail) (200 - 500 MHz)
Max video memoryno data2 GB
Graphics max frequencyno data500 MHz
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data2

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data1920x1080

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350.

PCIe versionno data2.0
PCI Express lanesno data1
USB revisionno data3.0

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.56
Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 has a 1.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Atom x5-Z8350, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 542.9% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is a desktop processor while Atom x5-Z8350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Atom x5-Z8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Atom x5-Z8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 110 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 377 votes

Rate Atom x5-Z8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 or Atom x5-Z8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.