Athlon 64 FX-57 vs Athlon 64 X2 FX-60

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
2 cores / 2 threads, 110 Watt
0.57
+72.7%
Athlon 64 FX-57
2005
1 core / 1 thread, 104 Watt
0.33

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 outperforms Athlon 64 FX-57 by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon 64 FX-57 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking28243091
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Series2x Athlon 64 (Desktop)no data
Power efficiency0.490.30
Architecture codenameToledo (2006)San Diego (2001−2005)
Release dateno dataJune 2005 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon 64 FX-57 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz2.8 GHz
Bus rate1000 MHzno data
L1 cacheno data128 KB
L2 cacheno data1 MB
L3 cacheno data0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm90 nm
Die sizeno data115 mm2
Number of transistorsno data114 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 (Desktop) FX-60 and Athlon 64 FX-57 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configurationno data1
Socketno data939
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt104 Watt

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.33
Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 104 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 has a 72.7% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Athlon 64 FX-57, on the other hand, has 5.8% lower power consumption.

The Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 FX-57 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 and Athlon 64 FX-57, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
Athlon 64 X2 FX-60
AMD Athlon 64 FX-57
Athlon 64 FX-57

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 110 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 3 votes

Rate Athlon 64 FX-57 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 FX-60 or Athlon 64 FX-57, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.