Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Primary details
Comparing Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 2800 | not rated |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Market segment | Desktop processor | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 0.45 | no data |
Architecture codename | Windsor (2006−2007) | Griffin (2008−2009) |
Release date | August 2007 (17 years ago) | December 2008 (15 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 2 (Dual-core) | 2 (Dual-core) |
Threads | 2 | 2 |
Boost clock speed | 3.1 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
L1 cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
L2 cache | 512K | 2 MB |
L3 cache | 0 KB | 0 KB |
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Die size | 220 mm2 | no data |
Number of transistors | 227 million | no data |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
Compatibility
Information on Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | AM2 | S1 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
PowerNow | - | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 are enumerated here.
AMD-V | - | + |
Pros & cons summary
Chip lithography | 90 nm | 65 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 35 Watt |
Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process, and 257.1% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88. We've got no test results to judge.
Note that Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is a desktop processor while Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88 is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 6000+ and Turion X2 Ultra ZM-88, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.