Xeon W-10885M vs Athlon 64 X2 5400+

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 5400+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.57
Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.93
+1642%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5400+ by a whopping 1642% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2829780
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorMobile workstation
Seriesno dataComet Lake
Power efficiency0.6120.87
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release dateDecember 2006 (18 years ago)13 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.8 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus rateno data8 GT/s
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB2 MB
L3 cache0 KB16 MB
Chip lithography90 nm14 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data100 °C
Number of transistors154 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt45 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsno dataIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+
Speed Shiftno data+
Hyper-Threading Technologyno data+
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data+

Security technologies

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXTno data+
EDBno data+
Secure Keyno data+
Identity Protection-+
SGXno dataYes with Intel® ME
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-dno data+
VT-xno data+
EPTno data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data45.8 GB/s
ECC memory support-+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel Processors
Quick Sync Video-+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.25 GHz

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
DVIno data+

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution supportno data+
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096x2304@30Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data4096x2304@60Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data4096x2304@60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M.

PCIe versionno data3.0
PCI Express lanesno data16

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 0.57
Xeon W-10885M 9.93
+1642%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 907
Xeon W-10885M 15776
+1639%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 275
Xeon W-10885M 1602
+483%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 5400+ 501
Xeon W-10885M 7051
+1307%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 9.93
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 45 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has a 1642.1% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 97.8% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-10885M is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5400+ in performance tests.

Be aware that Athlon 64 X2 5400+ is a desktop processor while Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5400+ and Xeon W-10885M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Athlon 64 X2 5400+
Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 40 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 45 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5400+ or Xeon W-10885M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.