EPYC 9535 vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2839not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorServer
Power efficiency0.57no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Turin (2024)
Release dateSeptember 2006 (18 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,992

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)64 (Tetrahexaconta-Core)
Threads2128
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz4.3 GHz
L1 cache256 KB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K1 MB (per core)
L3 cache0 KB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography90 nm4 nm
Die size220 mm28x 70.6 mm2
Number of transistors154 million66,520 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-no data

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketAM2SP5
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR5

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanesno data128

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 64
Threads 2 128
Chip lithography 90 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 300 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ has 237.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9535, on the other hand, has 3100% more physical cores and 6300% more threads, and a 2150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop processor while EPYC 9535 is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and EPYC 9535, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD EPYC 9535
EPYC 9535

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 311 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9535 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5200+ or EPYC 9535, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.