Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2840not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Power efficiency0.57no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Kentsfield (2007)
Release dateSeptember 2006 (18 years ago)23 July 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$266

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads24
Base clock speedno data2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache512K8 MB (shared)
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm65 nm
Die size220 mm22x 143 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data62 °C
Number of transistors154 million582 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2775
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt95 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)no data+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR1, DDR2, DDR3

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W).

PCIe versionno data2.0

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 4
Threads 2 4
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 95 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ has 6.7% lower power consumption.

Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W). We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)
Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W)

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 311 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 426 votes

Rate Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5200+ or Core 2 Quad Q6600 (95W), agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.