Athlon XP-M 2600+ vs Athlon 64 X2 5200+

VS

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+ processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2838not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentDesktop processorLaptop
Seriesno dataAMD Athlon XP-M
Power efficiency0.57no data
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Barton (2001−2004)
Release dateSeptember 2006 (18 years ago)January 2001 (23 years ago)

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+ basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)1 (Single-Core)
Threads21
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz1.83 GHz
Bus typeno dataFSB
Bus rateno data333 MT/s
Multiplierno data11
L1 cache256 KB128 KB
L2 cache512K512 KB
L3 cache0 KB0 KB
Chip lithography90 nm130 nm
Die size220 mm2101 mm2
Number of transistors154 million54 Million
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility--

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+ compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketAM2A
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

PowerNow-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Maximum memory sizeno data4 GB

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 2 1
Threads 2 1
Chip lithography 90 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 35 Watt

Athlon 64 X2 5200+ has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 44.4% more advanced lithography process.

Athlon XP-M 2600+, on the other hand, has 154.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+. We've got no test results to judge.

Note that Athlon 64 X2 5200+ is a desktop processor while Athlon XP-M 2600+ is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5200+ and Athlon XP-M 2600+, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5200+
Athlon 64 X2 5200+
AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+
Athlon XP-M 2600+

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 311 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Athlon XP-M 2600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5200+ or Athlon XP-M 2600+, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.