Ryzen 7 3700X vs Athlon 64 X2 5000+

VS

Aggregate performance score

Athlon 64 X2 5000+
2006
2 cores / 2 threads, 89 Watt
0.51
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
14.73
+2788%

Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Athlon 64 X2 5000+ by a whopping 2788% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2877507
Place by popularitynot in top-10073
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.31
Market segmentDesktop processorDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD Ryzen 7
Power efficiency0.5220.66
Architecture codenameWindsor (2006−2007)Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Release dateMay 2006 (18 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores2 (Dual-core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads216
Base clock speedno data3.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache256 KB512 KB
L2 cache512 KB4 MB
L3 cache0 KB32 MB
Chip lithography90 nm7 nm, 12 nm
Die size220 mm2no data
Number of transistors154 million19,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility-+
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11 (Uniprocessor)
SocketAM2AM4
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI-+
AVX-+
Precision Boost 2no data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesno dataDDR4 Dual-channel
Maximum memory sizeno data128 GB
Max memory channelsno data2
Maximum memory bandwidthno data51.196 GB/s

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 0.51
Ryzen 7 3700X 14.73
+2788%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 786
Ryzen 7 3700X 22540
+2768%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 195
Ryzen 7 3700X 1671
+757%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Athlon 64 X2 5000+ 335
Ryzen 7 3700X 8083
+2313%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.51 14.73
Physical cores 2 8
Threads 2 16
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 65 Watt

Ryzen 7 3700X has a 2788.2% higher aggregate performance score, 300% more physical cores and 700% more threads, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 36.9% lower power consumption.

The Ryzen 7 3700X is our recommended choice as it beats the Athlon 64 X2 5000+ in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Athlon 64 X2 5000+ and Ryzen 7 3700X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+
Athlon 64 X2 5000+
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 178 votes

Rate Athlon 64 X2 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5296 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 3700X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Athlon 64 X2 5000+ or Ryzen 7 3700X, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.